On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 06:15 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:41:18 +0200
> From: Michiel van Baak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP vs. SKINNY
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On 14:16, Wed 25 Jun 08, Joe Carroll wrote:
> > Can anyone comment on the performance benefits when comparing sip to
> skinny ?
>
> Most cisco phones work better with the skinny firmware.
>
> That is not true when connecting to asterisk though.
>
> It all depends on the version of asterisk you are running.
> I have a setup with over 20 skinny phones on asterisk -trunk and that
> works great. Specially after today, now that chan_skinny supports
> transfers.
>
> If you are running 1.4 I'm not sure what is best. It basically depends
> on what you are doing with the phones.
> In my home setup it worked great, but in my business I have to run
> trunk
> for the phones to be as workable as the sip variant.
>
> The skinny firmware has some neat stuff like XML push etc.
> Dont know how the current SIP firmware is doing, as I have not run it
> in
> over 2 years now.
>
> YMMV
Does Skinny let Cisco 79xx phones act as extensions *across the
Internet* to a remote Asterisk server? Does SIP? How do the different
SCCP channels compare to the chan_skinny support, in Asterisk 1.6? Is
there a better guide than http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/chan_skinny
to getting chan_skinny working best with Asterisk and Cisco 79xx phones?
> Michiel van Baak
--
(C) Matthew Rubenstein
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
