VinÃcius Fontes wrote: > When people release software under the GPL license, like Steve Underwood did > with libunicall, spandsp and so on, they were supposed to know that other > people has the right to use their code. > The problem is that almost any licence term which tries to limit the obnoxious behaviour of other people has too many unpleasant side effects. GPL 2.0 is the best compromise I've found, so that is what I used for everything unless recently. To make my stuff licence compatible with FreeSwitch I recently relicenced most of my work as LGPL 2.1. This is having undesirable consequences, though. Its really a tough issue, and GPL 2.0 showed immense foresight in just accepting the non-existence of perfect solutions. GPL 3 seems to have forgotten the lesson somewhat.
Most of the time I just want to give up producing anything at all. Steve _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
