> I am puzzled by the quality of magicjack. I keep trying to figure out how > they can the quality be that adequate. Since Skype also has an excellent > quality, that leaves me to believe that software based calls (softphones) > could have and advantage over hardphones, provided there is a parameter that > those 2 companies are addressing.
You are puzzled by the quality? http://www.laptopmag.com/review/voip/magicjack.aspx I don't know, but from the sounds of the comments, you'd get about just as much quality out of an actual cigarette lighter, and probably a good bit more usefulness. Nice EULA, by the way: http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/04/14/magicjacks-eula-says.html VoIP over the Internet isn't /that/ hard. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
