Hi, Using FOP, I've met a situation which makes me ask this simple question :
Are both A and B commands bellow equivalent ? A. CLI: originate SIP/9122 application dial Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] B. AMI/FOP: 192.168.64.5 -> Action: Originate 192.168.64.5 -> Channel: SIP/9122 192.168.64.5 -> Async: True 192.168.64.5 -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122> 192.168.64.5 -> Exten: 9123 192.168.64.5 -> Context: local 192.168.64.5 -> Priority: 1 I must add both 9122 and 9123 extensions are SIP extensions which default to "local" context. When using B (AMI/FOP), I've got a : -- Got SIP response 480 "Temporarily Unavailable" back from 192.168.100.195 > Channel SIP/9122-081d8f68 was never answered. where 192.168.100.195 is SIP/9122 hardphone IP address When using A (CLI), everything works ok. Regards
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users