Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:16 -0400, SIP wrote: > >> The RFCs are there for a reason. All SIP forking is UAS territory. Not >> UAC territory. >> > > From http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553810 Damien Sandras > asks: > > I repeat, Ekiga is doing something perfectly legal. > > The real question is why does Asterisk think it is the same request > when the > from tag is different ? > > b. > > Oh yes. It's perfectly legal.
It's also a) NOT SIP forking, b) Lazy, and c) Poorly designed. Sending multiple requests and hoping and praying that the recipient will ignore two of them (it will NOT in many cases -- specifically set out by the RFC -- see MESSAGE) because the tag is different doesn't make it any less poorly designed just because it's not specifically written that it can't be done. N. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
