Rob Hillis wrote: > Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:42:52AM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> >> >>> Your monitoring app is not sending valid IAX2 packets to the server. If >>> it was sending a true IAX2 POKE, it would be a valid packet and wouldn't >>> generate this warning. >>> >>> >> Could asterisk at least _not_ report this harmless, below-warning event >> when using a zero-verbose (asterisk -r) level? That would be nice and >> logical. >> >> > > Actually, I would have said that corrupt/bad IAX packsets *should* be > reported and are *not* harmless. They're harmless in your instance > because your monitoring application isn't functioning properly, but to > anyone else they're likely to indicate either (a) a hacking attempt or > (b) a fairly serious network problem. > > How about you fix your monitoring application to send a correct IAX2 > POKE request? > > Personally, I just like reading the word 'midget' . It makes me smile.
PaulH _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
