On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Steve Totaro wrote: > > > While not taking the time to look, and if memory serves me correctly, > > LAN devices appear on the correct ports even with nat=yes. I may be > > wrong.... I will have to double check this when I have a moment. > > That is not my understanding from the code. > I believe that if you are speaking of code and Asterisk's implementation of the SIP RFC it is already very borked in many many ways. I speak from what I see in userspace, real-world, although, as I said, I am going from memory and could be wrong. > > Also, I am curious - what is the definition of "LAN device" as you are > using it here? Is it a network with 1) an RFC1918 address and 2) a > network on which the system running Asterisk has a physical interface > binding? If so, what about other routed subnets also on a LAN? > > I define a LAN based on layer 2 and more recently layer 3 (layer 3 aware switches) of the OSI reference model. Call me old school but I got my CCNA in the nineties. "If so, what about other routed subnets also on a LAN?", sorry, I do not understand what you are asking...... > > -- > Alex Balashov > Evariste Systems > Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ > Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 > Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 > Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 > > > -- Thanks, Steve Totaro +18887771888 (Toll Free) +12409381212 (Cell) +12024369784 (Skype)
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users