Klaus Darilion wrote: > Of course we know that we should implement RFC conform. But RFC 3261 has > ignored the fact that the Internet is full of NATs and standard conform > implementations can not work. This in the case of SIP it necessary to > break the RFC.
By default? NAT itself is a hack; therefore, I would think that NAT traversal assistance should be enabled when NAT is used. Why would we presume NAT and implement behaviour that is only desirable under NAT as a default? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
