On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 15:32 +0200, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote: > But the new CDRs that we are discussing would have to deal > with transfers correctly. I think that's where the whole thing started. > > I am not happy with the current CDRs system either. I find it obsolete. > That is why I am not using it for billing purposes. But a NEW one that > meets certain criteria would be ideal for billing. >
Well, read my draft RFC, and see if I'm on the right track. Tune into CDR Design in the subject line in this email list, and let's toss this around and see if consensus is possible. svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs and an occasional "svn update" in the RFCs dir will keep you up to date. Or you can just read it via your browser at: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs/CDRfix2.rfc.txt?view=log and choose the (view) of the first numbered revision in the list to see the latest version. murf -- Steve Murphy Software Developer Digium
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
