On Wednesday 25 February 2009 09:51:23 Klaus Darilion wrote: > Tilghman Lesher schrieb: > > On Tuesday 24 February 2009 16:07:52 Klaus Darilion wrote: > >> Barry L. Kline wrote: > >>> that is supposed to gosub into the incoming extension at priority 1. > >>> Versions before 1.6.0.6 would drop into the incoming,i,1 priority if > >>> the requested extension wasn't present in the incoming context. > >> > >> Really strange that Goto and Gosub behave different. > > > > If Goto behaves that way, that's a bug. As stated in a prior email, the > > "i" extension should only be implicitly invoked when waiting for a new > > extension and the typed extension does not match anything. > > FYI: If you take a look at the history of > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+i+extension you > will find out that the old behavior is there since at least Nov. 2005, > and probably used since then.
voip-info.org is best known for being often wrong. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users