Hello! Oh, yes, I will be mirroring the harddrives in case of any failures.
What is your opinion about using (software) RAID? Do you think the overhead impacts performance too much? In an ideal situation, I would use hardware RAID, but that is not feasible right now. Thanks, Elliot On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jay Milk <ast-us...@skimmilk.net> wrote: > Elliot Murdock wrote: >> Hello Everybody! >> >> I am currently setting up an Asterisk server for medium to high load >> (approximately 20-35 concurrent phone lines). >> >> Do you think the following specs will sufficiently satisfy this system? >> >> CPU: XeonQC3220 2.4GHZ 8M >> RAM: 2X2GB/800 >> Harddrive: 1X250GB >> >> I could add harddrives and partition them into /var and /log >> directories to help with diskdrive throughput. >> >> Thanks! >> Elliot >> >> > I'm sure this is common sense, but make sure you have a plan B for when > that HD fails. It will. > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
