On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:55:55 John A. Sullivan III wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:18 -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 11:56:28 John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:44 -0400, Sean Bright wrote: > > > > Watkins, Bradley wrote: > > > > > One more bit of magic necessary here, as pbx/pbx_lua.c has includes > > > > > for: #include <lua5.1/lua.h> > > > > > #include <lua5.1/lauxlib.h> > > > > > #include <lua5.1/lualib.h> > > > > > > > > > > On Redhat-based systems, it needs to be: > > > > > #include <lua.h> > > > > > #include <lauxlib.h> > > > > > #include <lualib.h> > > > > > > > > Gah. OK. So the patch I supplied will find LUA at configure time > > > > but not compile time. This needs some more thought. > > > > > > Oops! Confirmed. menuselect found it but make failed. I'll make the > > > edits by hand and let you know how I fared - John > > > > Try this patch: > > http://asterisk.drunkcoder.com/patches/20090617__luafix.diff.txt > > Alas, the patch fails completely. The configure revision numbers look > very different. I am using the 1.6.1.1 tarball. I copied the patch > into the source directory (asterisk-1.6.1.1) and ran patch -p0 < > 20090617__luafix.diff.txt. It was a long list of failed hunks. What > next? Thanks - John
The patch is actually derived from the current 1.6.1 SVN source, so any changes made since 1.6.1.1 was branched are the difference. Updated patch: http://asterisk.drunkcoder.com/patches/20090617__luafix__1.6.1.1.diff.txt -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users