I'm going to give a "qualified" no. The reason being is that setvar works in a session (say SIP/100-abcdefg) and the blind transfer may spawn a new session like Local/1-abcdefg). So your only solid variables are the global ones. You can verify this by looking at CLI output with verbose set to at least 5.
-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:18 PM To: Philipp Kempgen Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] setvar and transfer Philipp Kempgen <philipp.kemp...@amooma.de> writes: > Benny Amorsen schrieb: > >> Last concern: Does setvar work even for transfers, like accountcode >> does? > > I can't answer your question, but transfer != transfer. Some use > a feature code in Asterisk, some initiate a transfer on their phone, > some use a way to call the Transfer() application. > Mixing it up causes a lot of confusion. Sorry, I meant "Does setvar work even for SIP blind transfers during calls, like accountcode codes?" /Benny _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
