Louis-David Mitterrand schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:37:38AM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
>> On 10:17, Fri 24 Jul 09, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>> >
>> > This used to work fine in 1.4:
>> >
>> > exten => 2131/,1,NoOp(reject3: ${CALLERID(num)})
>> > exten => 2131/,n,Playback(no_unknow_callerid_here)
>> > exten => 2131/,n,Hangup
>> >
>> > And now, after upgrading to 1.6.1.x it matches every callerid.
> Why remove the elegant and minimal <exten>/<emtpy>
> notation
Not that need the <exten>/<callerid> syntax for anything but I'd say
this is a bug and a regression.
The syntax is exten[/callerid] so the "/" clearly says that there
is a second "argument" even if that happens to be an empty string.
Philipp Kempgen
--
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998
Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de
Videos of the AMOOCON VoIP conference 2009 -> http://www.amoocon.de
--
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
