On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Miguel Molina<mmol...@millenium.com.co> wrote: > John F. Ervin escribió: > I'd go VoIP without thinking twice. We are on the 21st century!
Sailboats are ancient, but they're still a reliable way to get across a body of water. Some people pay a very large amount of money for a sailboat, and then they race other sailboats. Bikes are still the most efficient way to move a human. Algebra and calculus are are old. I still use them everyday. Actually, I bike to work too. > in. VoIP will be as reliable and good quality as your network is. The > savings of not having to make double phone/data cabling and the > advantages of VoIP are now a standard worldwide, from carriers to small > home PBXs. Ummm, I've never had my physical phone lines vulnerable to the latest SIP credential guessing game. I don't have to license a codec just to terminate a phone call. I can think of several more advantages. But as I mentioned in my original post, I have a lot of physical telco circuits because they cost less when you do a lot of call volume. VoIP is nice inside the border where it can't be attacked by the script kiddies, and where bandwidth is free. Wire has a fixed cost. Telephone billing incurs costs in direct proportion to the amount of calling. If you pay an extra 1 cent per minute for voip, times 10,000,000 minutes a year, well, I'll happily pocket the difference. > Analog lines are definitely legacy. The last time I put a T1 channel > bank into use was more than two years ago, and never had to configure > another one since then. It must have been pretty reliable then :) I've had to patch for SIP vulnerabilities several times in two years. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
