-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mauro Sergio Ferreira Brasil wrote:
> I totally agree with you that this is an unnatural behavior, but I have > to agree as well with our commercial staff because their vision was > naturaly translated from our telephony world (we don't have a different > ID - telephone number - to each phone we have home, right ?). Well, our phones at home are probably analog and can be connected in parallel. Unfortunately, VoIP phones are a different matter and need to be identified individually. I guess I don't get the problem your commercial side is having with this concept. You can produce the same result doing things within the constraints of SIP using the features built into Asterisk. Doing what you want may be possible with a bunch of contortions, but it's going to be an unnatural act fraught with tons of unexpected behavior. If you do get it working the way you describe you'll likely be doing so because of a side-effect behavior in a GIVEN version of Asterisk. The moment you change versions, the side effect may or may not be the same and you may find yourself in the same trouble. I can't offer anything more to help you except to wish you the best of luck. You're going to need it. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKlWonCFu3bIiwtTARAu1WAJ0eS2Eh6n6Tici9eDA82UIesuozNACaA9yi jT8u2aZfUHcSXGvJnc1FDEI= =VQhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
