On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:45:22AM -0500, Steve said: > On Thursday 15 January 2004 01:30 am, Chandra wrote: > > hi i am not talking about * behind NAT. its * outside NAT and GS inside > > NAT. > > Why leave a host to defend for itself? At least behind a firewall you got some > layers of protection.
Um, just becasue a host isn't NATed, doesn't meant that there isn't a firewall protecting it. Nat is an evil hack used to allow more hosts to use the internet than you have real IP addresses. NAT itself is NOT a firewall, but it does have a side effect by nature that gives NATed hosts some protection. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users