If you do Record(x.WAV) instead record(x.wav) the output will be in WAV49 format.
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kim Delevati Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:08 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality Adittional doubt: can I use WAV49 on the Record() command? Voip-info doesnt say anything about it (or the WAV listed there is equivalent to WAV49, being wav = WAV). 2009/10/6 Kim Delevati <[email protected]> Hi! I tested with wav49 and now the quality is MUCH better. Almost the same as the call. I dont know the reason, probably it was some problem on the decoding of the codec I used to wav, strangely that doesnt happen with wav49. The quality now is very acceptable, whereas with wav I couldnt understand a word. Also the files are much smaller, which is even better. Thank you all for you answers. 2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <[email protected]> WAV49 is by definition lesser quality but Louder sound, which might help the perceived quality. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kim Delevati Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:23 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I wrong? On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the recording has poor quality. Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone know where to find it? 2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <[email protected]> I doubt AGI is the issue. You can verify this by setting up a context to record a call without AGI. I'd try using the WAV49 format instead of regular WAV. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kim Delevati Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality Hi. I'm using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP, but the quality is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is perfect. I can barely understand anything thats said. Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz with 1gb DDR2. That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an AGI file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else? _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
