-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Olivier a écrit : | | | 2009/10/24 Jean-Denis Girard <jd.gir...@sysnux.pf | <mailto:jd.gir...@sysnux.pf>> | | Olivier a écrit : | | Hello, | | | | I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term | | workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are | | planning to do (we wish to use Junghanns and Digium BRI hardware with | | Asterisk 1.6) . | | Dahdi has been working fine for me for a few months, using a Junghanns | DuoBRI and asterisk-1.6. I have used bristuff before, it usually worked | fine, but separate patch. I also tried chan_misdn but quickly abandoned. | | |> Do you mean you abondoned chan_misdn (1.1.9-1) with 1.6.x on Junghanns |> hardware or are you thinking about another combination ? | |> Did you change because revision-2822-enabled Dahdi ran successfully |> enough that you didn't need to further try with misdn or because you met |> bloking issues ?
Sorry if that my post was not clear. I'm using Dahdi because I'm happy with it. It works and is simple to set up: it does not need any external patch / software. Before BRI support in Dahdi, I used BRIstuff, which worked fine, but didn't follow Asterisk releases. And it was more work to set up. I tried mISDN, but then I depended on specific kernel versions. I also had echo problems. So I quickly abandoned mISDN. The conclusion is that I'm very happy with BRI support in Dahdi. I've been waiting for it, probably for more than 5 years ! Regards, - -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 50 10 40 / GSM: +689 79 75 27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkrlyAsACgkQuu7Rv+oOo/hvTgCfaPXjHD90VpeNlSMH/GPY9bzk jvMAn2hzE3JWJ/iY+LXf7Zj6hfHPcT2R =caOJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users