On Monday 15 February 2010 03:37:24 Rob Hillis wrote: > On 02/15/10 20:00, Randy R wrote: > > Olle, this may be a stupid question, but shouldn't a native santitize > > function be urgently added to the code base in all versions or change > > the dialplan compîler to ignore dangerous characters? > > Whilst I agree with this, the unfortunate attitude we seem to get from > Digium on most of these issues is "you can already do this in dialplan, > therefore we don't need to invest any effort in it." The fact that a > workaround may be quite difficult to implement properly doesn't come in > to it. The most obvious example of this one is the deprecation and > removal of chan_agent without any sort of replacement being introduced > because "it's already possible to do in the dialplan".
Uh, chan_agent has been neither removed nor deprecated. -- Tilghman Lesher Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode) Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
