19 feb 2010 kl. 10.22 skrev Randy R: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Olle E. Johansson <o...@edvina.net> wrote: >> You propably have a type=friend where the user part matches before you even >> hit the peer part, where the insecure configuration parameter matches. There >> is a confusion here on the From: username and the authentication username >> used, so there is a challenge sent. > > Is it just me, or would it be nice if a clear, understandable and > unambiguous way to express codec desirata was invented? Is there a > future iteration of SIP that deals with it?
It's not only SIP, it's the whole Asterisk codec negotiation framework that needs a serious overhaul: Please read: http://www.voip-forum.com/asterisk/2010-02/asterisk-18-lts-wishlist-1-media-negiotiation-framework/ Interestingly enough, this blog post (and the same message on asterisk-dev) has got NO feedback, even though this has been a hot topic for years. /O -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
