> On 06/22/2010 04:38 PM, marek cervenka wrote: >>> On 06/22/2010 02:51 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: >>>> On 2010-06-22 12:36, Remco Bressers wrote: >>>>> Dear list, >>>>> >>>>> I've got the following setup : >>>>> >>>>> [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-----[upstream SIP] >>>>> >>>>> On the PBX's we run Asterisk 1.4.33 with t38pt_udptl=yes in [general]. >>>>> The FAX ATA is a Teles VoIPBox with T.38 support (that works). On the >>>>> PBX WAN, i see the following in udptl debug : >>>>> >>>>> Sent UDPTL packet to 172.16.0.156:4460 (type 0, seq 184, len 32) >>>>> Got UDPTL packet from 62.180.xx.xx:36170 (type 0, seq 0, len 32) >>>>> Sent UDPTL packet to 172.16.0.156:4460 (type 0, seq 185, len 32) >>>>> Got UDPTL packet from 62.180.xx.xx:36170 (type 0, seq 0, len 32) >>>>> Sent UDPTL packet to 172.16.0.156:4460 (type 0, seq 186, len 32) >>>>> Got UDPTL packet from 62.180.xx.xx:36170 (type 0, seq 0, len 29) >>>>> >>>>> This means my outgoing udptl traffic is correctly translated, but >>>>> somehow i'm sending 172.16.0.156 instead of my public IP address on the >>>>> firewall. >> >> try asterisk 1.6.2.9 > > What would be the reason to do that? Is there any change on this in 1.6.2.9?
yes 1.6.2.x branch is a lot better in T.38 area --------------------------------------- Marek Cervenka ======================================= -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users