Michel- > I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same > result...Bad Voice Quality
I think you have to be more specific when you say "bad voice quality". Like what? Worse than a cellphone call? Gaps of audio missing? Robotic or "cyborg" sound? Static? A background tone or buzzing? iLBC isn't any worse voice quality than other LBR codecs (GSM-AMR, EVRC, etc). If you want land-line quality and what you're hearing is cellphone quality, then you're asking too much. Otherwise, suggest to be specific and detailed in describing your problem. -Jeff > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Tim Nelson <tnel...@rockbochs.com> wrote: > >> ----- "michel freiha" <mich...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Dear All, >> > >> > i would like to ask please if someone tried to make a codec conversion >> from ilbc to g729, because i did that but the voice quality was too bad and >> a lot of disconnection.. >> > >> > Can i get your feedback regarding this issue please? >> > >> > regards >> >> I can't comment on your 'disconnection' as you don't say if that means the >> call is disconnected or you're getting stuttered audio. Regardless, iLBC has >> one of the lowest bitrates of the available codecs and as such the voice >> quality is not spectacular to begin with. Take 'not so good' audio and try >> to convert it to another audio format, and the deficiencies can be >> exacerbated. >> >> --Tim -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
