BTW, the issue was created yesterday, but I didn't think there was a need to post it here but nevertheless for posterity, the Issue ID is: 18442
Thanks \RR On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:57 PM, RR <ranjt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tilghman Lesher <tles...@digium.com>wrote: > >> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 14:21:57 RR wrote: >> > Hi Guys, >> > Any one want to take a stab at helping with this please?? All I have >> > found so far is that the netsock.c file has code that references to >> > taking note when it's being built on a Solaris platform, but since I >> > don't understand this a whole lot, I am not sure where to go from >> > here...this is the excerpt from the netsock.c file: >> > >> > *#if defined (SOLARIS) >> > #include <sys/sockio.h> >> > #elif defined(HAVE_GETIFADDRS) >> > #include <ifaddrs.h> >> > #endif >> > * >> > I would've have thought this would have taken care of the issue by >> > making sure 'make' handles this correctly but I guess not. Anyone? >> > Please? >> >> http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=116059&tstart=105 >> >> I suspect we'll have to make a more complex check to verify that the >> structure elements are all there. Please open an issue on >> issues.asterisk.org and reference this thread. We can then put up a >> patch that you can use to verify if better detection fixes your issue. >> Once verified, the patch will find its way into releases. >> >> -- >> Tilghman Lesher >> Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer >> twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode) >> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org >> >> >> > G'day Tilghman, > > Thanks for that thread. I guess a few other things broke because of the > change and the consuming application then needs to be a little smarter like > you said (and suggested by darrenr) to detect whether you're on OSOL or > Solaris. Does that mean I should check this same thing out on Solaris 10 as > well and see what happens? I am so lost with the Solaris build environment > as (and I whinged about this earlier too) there is no good way of obtaining > the standard Solaris packages and dependancies and everything just goes all > over the place and then one is left scurrying around to find where the damn > library needs to be for it to compile. > > Anyway, I will open an issue and reference this thread and we'll go from > there. > > BTW, THANK YOU for taking note of this and trying to help. You guys will > have bottomless beer pitchers paid for if you guys help me get this working > and are ever in the NY area :) > > Cheers, > \R > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
