On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Rymes <try...@rymes.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Bruce B wrote: > > > You really want to read the LONG LONG signature from some people before > you read the actual latest message? I don't know about that....I guess it's > a preference. > > Suffice it to say, Bruce, this subject has been hashed over thousands, nay, > hundreds of thousands of times, and I doubt anything new can be had from > doing it again. > > FYI, It is also considered good etiquette to remove any non-relevant > information from the quoted text to keep it short and easy to parse, > especially removing the automatically generated footers from the list. > > As for your question about ports (see, I can stay on topic occasionally!), > someone already mentioned something about some equipment using 5004 for RTP, > IIRC, and I mentioned the common use of 5061, 5062, 5063, etc for multiple > SIP clients behind NAT. There may be other reasons, too. > > Tom >
Thanks. That is in both TCP and UDP for SIP right? or simply UDP would do it as well? I am talking strictly in case of Asterisk. -Bruce
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
