_____ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.
Thanks buddy, But I think, AMD helps when I call customer first and then SIP extension. Any other suggestion! On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Danny Nicholas <da...@debsinc.com> wrote: _____ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:13 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file. Hi Group, I have following case scenario. Through call file, Asterisk makes a call to SIP extension. When Extension answers the call, Asterisk reads customer numbers (set in callfile) and calls them one by one untill one of the customers answeres the call. Here customer and SIP extension gets patched and talk to each other. Now if outgoing call is answered by Answering machine,I don't want asterisk to patch it up with SIP extension. Please suggest me how this can be achieved. Thanking you in advance. --AM May or may not help - google for "Asterisk AMD" - round 2 - You could use the "privacy" setting on dial, so the end user has to press 1 to accept the call?
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
