On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:38 pm, Paul Belanger wrote: > On 11-04-11 10:26 AM, Effie Mouzeli wrote: >> This may lead to some buggy clients not to accept the call (with 488), >> but I've noticed some cases where a callee was behind NAT, >> an INVITE with one video codec would me forwarded properly >> to the callee, but another INVITE with 3 video codecs, would >> never reach the callee, probably because it was never forwarded by >> the router (I still haven't been able to figure this out). >> > The code you are talking about underwent a complete rewrite [1] and has > already been merged into trunk[2]. Not that it helps you now, but you > may want to try testing with trunk (will become Asterisk 1.10) and see > if you have the same issues. > > This is one of the major milestones for Asterisk 1.10, and I'm sure any > feedback in testing will be much appreciated. > > [1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Media+Architecture+Proposal > [2] http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=revision&revision=306010
Thank you very much for your input Paul, I will try to test it at some point. -effie -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
