Thank you for your answer. I also prefer AMI for its flexibility. However, i have an application developped in PHP used to make more than 100000 calls a day by group of 120 concurrent calls. My problem with AMI is that client keeps disconnected to AMI server. I use astmanproxy as proxy server. Do you to use have such problem with your applications ?
Regards On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@digium.com>wrote: > On 11-04-20 12:20 PM, Adolphe Cher-Aime wrote: > >> In the case of a multiserver environment for outbound >> automatic calls, can you share you experience and preference between call >> files and ami originate ? >> >> I prefer using the AMI as I have better call control. I also get to > monitor the AMI events are react to them. Recently I've been using Python > and starpy (twisted). > > -- > Paul Belanger > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) > Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- *Adolphe CHER-AIME Network / VoIP Engineer CCNA, CCNA VOICE, Global VSAT Forum Certified (509) 3449-4280*
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users