On 07/06/2011 04:44 PM, Alec Davis wrote:
IMHO, blind tranfer definition is to NOT connect A and B back
That is correct, and is why it's called a 'blind' transfer;
the transferring party does not know or care what happens to
the call after effecting the transfer.
That's not what users migrating from some legacy PBXs expect, our old
Fujitsu essence will call back the transferrer if the call isn't answered.
The good old 'hook flash', dial the extension, then hangup.
Well, that would have to be handled in the dialplan somehow, because
Asterisk alone can't decide when a call is 'not answered'. However,
writing such a dialplan would indeed be non-trivial :-)
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kflem...@digium.com | SIP: kpflem...@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
