On 08/30/2011 12:53 PM, Fabian Borot wrote:
txs a lot for your explanation steve so, it should work w/o spandsp fairly fine if we do not have a bad connection. I see that this version has a lot of fixes related to t.38 but is the implementation already mature enough to guarantee a decent success rate with fax calls?
Since you are using T.38, nothing is going to guarantee that... there are many obstacles to achieving it. We can try, though :-)
There's really no way to figure out what is happening here without a packet capture of all the traffic and an Asterisk console log at high verbose/debug levels. Is there a way you can produce that and provide it to us without having to reveal confidential information? If not, we can create a private issue on the issue tracker for you to have a place to upload your files without them being visible to the public.
-- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kflem...@digium.com | SIP: kpflem...@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
