--- On Wed, 2/8/12, Jason W. Parks <jason.w.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > From everything I've researched to > date, my understanding is most > locations have chosen to double their port density and > continue to > service the phone and computer on separate ports than to > share a single > line for both computer and phone. Reason primarily mentioned > being > troubleshooting concerns. If this is the case, the second > port is not > required, and become nothing but another gimmick to sell to > you. > > Is this everyone else's experience as well?
Well, at some locations, for technical and mostly political reasons, doubling port density so that the computer connects to a separate port is too costly, way over what a 60$ hardphone can cost (eg. Grandstream GXP285). I'd be glad to pay just "a tad more" for hundreds of "basic" hardphones, just as long as they can do gigabit. Vieri -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
