Perhaps your users live in an internet ghetto where the routers are
similar to Yugos with spinners.  We haven't run into any routers that
don't do NAT properly in a very very long time.


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Alejandro Imass <a...@p2ee.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Steve Totaro
> <stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Without trunking, you only have the single port thing.  It is quite easy to
>
> Nope. The main reason _we_ use IAX is because it's easier for NAT
>
>> open the correct ports for SIP, some just have GUI with a SIP checkbox,
>
> It may be true for you but it's certainly not "the truth".
>
> - SIP requires redirection of ports if behind a NAT which is about 99%
> of home users, whether behind a WiFi router or an ISP private network.
>
> - SIP requires far more set-up and support effort and it's not a valid
> choice for a simple to use home-phone. (a) ISP routers change IPs
> frequently, (b) the router may change the ATA's private IP rendering
> the port redirection broken.
>
> - A public SIP (w/o a VPN) requires careful control (e.g.
> contactpermit in Asterisk) to limit the IPs that can connect to the
> public box. Else you will get serous harm from things like SIPVicious
> attacks. ISP change their IPs frequently so maintaining your user/ip
> list is almost impossible. IAX2 was very vulnerable as well up to 2009
> but many things in this regard have changed and are much better.
> Granted, these security issues are common for both SIP and IAX2 but
> IMHO it's easier to manage with IAX.
>
> - In a NAT scenario SIP requires a couple of redirected ports per
> extension, which is a no-go for SMB installations requiring several
> ATAs without going to the extent of installing a more powerful
> equipment than a simple ATA.
>
> - You may use OpenVPN with SIP as you said but requires a PC which is
> not an option for a simple VoIP business that delivers something like
> Vonage, just plug it and it works. AFAIK there is no port redirection
> or any special configuration to use Vonage and it works almost on any
> network set-up (I don't use Vonage but know people that do). So if
> something like Vonage is using SIP it's probably using a VPN software
> like you recommend.
>
> Anyway, the point is that SIP and IAX2 have both pros and cons and I
> don't consider IAX2 to be a broken bat like you state. On the
> contrary, I think it works pretty well, and we use both SIP and IAX2
> targeted to simple Home, SOHO and SMBs that just want to plug it and
> work. We get that with IAX2 and not with SIP so from our experience is
> completely the opposite of what you say.
>
> --
> Alejandro Imass
>
>
>
> IAX2 is supported on cheap ATAs by several chineese companies and they
> work quite well.
>
>> IPTables is simple and there are tons of howtos.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve T
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Steve Totaro <stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> They said the same thing in 2005, 2008, now....  Every release.
>>>
>>> You never answered the question as to why you don't want to use SIP.  Is
>>> there a reason, or do you just want to torture yourself?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve T
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Troy Telford <ttelford.gro...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-02-28 21:22:44 +0000, Kevin P. Fleming said:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A serious bug with IAX2 trunking in recent versions of Asterisk (you did
>>>>> not mention what version you are using) was just resolved last week. You
>>>>> should test with 'trunk=no' to see if that is the cause of your problem;
>>>>> it seems very likely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For the record: 1.8.8.2~dfsg-1 (via Debian packages).
>>>>
>>>> I've tried "trunk=no", and it might have made a difference (I'll have a
>>>> better idea after some more testing.)
>>>> --
>>>> Troy Telford
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>>>              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>>>
>>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Carlos Alvarez
TelEvolve
602-889-3003

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to