On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Chris Gentle wrote: > I have a TDM410 with one FXO and one FXS. I've been running dahdi 2.5.0.2 > without any problems. A couple of weeks ago I upgraded to 2.6.0 and found > that caller ID was no long working for me. All calls came in with a blank > caller id. I reverted back to 2.5.0.2 and everything was happy again. I > tried upgrading to 2.6.0 again this morning and got the same results. I'm > compiling from source on an Ubuntu 10.04.4 box. I was very careful when I > merged my settings from my old 2.5.0.2 setup with the new 2.6.0 > configuration files. I've searched the bugs and read through the Changes > file but didn't see anything obvious. Should I file a bug?
Hi Chris, I believe this is fixed in the head of the 2.6 branch. We're prepping a 2.6.0.1 release now... [1] http://svnview.digium.com/svn/dahdi?view=revision&revision=10481 If you could try out the branch and let me know if it *doesn't* work for you, I would be appreciative. Thanks, Shaun -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
