>>>Not to bash on the developer who did this I get that we don't always think out side the box all the time
You can bash others all you want for not thinking outside the box, but where is your effort to think outside the box yourself?. All you have to do, (that's what I did, and took me like 4 hours) is write a program that parses through your dialplan code and translates the n's into actual numbers, including the translation of the gotos into line numbers. Sucks? yes. Is the realtime limitation going to stop me from doing what I want? no way.
Christian Savinovich
VoIP & Telephony Consultant
646-982-3572
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk realtime don't support 'n' as
extension's next priority
From: Leandro Dardini <ldard...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, August 03, 2012 10:11 am
To: brya...@zktech.com, Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
I am kissing every inch of land where each one of the asterisk's developer is putting his feet. In the last 10 years I have worked thanks to the availability of the asterisk code. Most of my income was possible just thanks to asterisk, so I am pretty biased when trying to evaluate if the asterisk code is good or not. You can understand if I "love" the way asterisk has been coded.Nevertheless things can be better and they can be better thanks to you. Asterisk is open source and Mark is a very kind person when you submit patches, so put your ideas in new code and send to him. If you don't know how to code, hire some developer and have him to code your view of a better RT code. If it will be accepted by the core developer, all us will be happy. if it will not accepted, you'll be happy with you own personal branch. I run for a small period of time my personal asterisk tree because the italian telephony system is flawed and clients want services not suitable for the general asterisk audience, so there is nothing to worry to have your personal asterisk code.LeandroPSI think your idea of extension RT can be accomplished with some triggers and replacing the extension table with a view on your own n-enabled extension table
2012/8/3 Bryant Zimmerman <brya...@zktech.com>Leandro
I have to disagree reasonable designers would have done a better job with this one. But we developers are not always so reasonable. The issue is many developers when pushing to put features in they don't put on their designers hat and think out side the box first.Heaven knows I have been guilty of this one over the years and had to go back and refactor. It is not so reasonable to think that this limitation has to exist developers have been putting order by fields in db driven systems for years. What of the guy who want's to use n(target) or 4(target) (I know this may have not been an option when RT was first done now it is) so they can add specialized jumping code. If I had been designing the Realtime (today) I would have added a field for the priority and made it a full alpha / numeric and added an order by field. As it sits now how do you do n, i, h or tags ect.... It kinda sucks and limits the Realtime. Not to bash on the developer who did this I get that we don't always think out side the box all the time nor was some of this ability available when the RT was written. but know it does so what do we do. Unfortunately I am not a ansi C guy or I could probably fix it .
Thanks
Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)
From: "Leandro Dardini" <ldard...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:18 AM
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk realtime don't support 'n' as extension's next priority
It is reasonable 'n' is not usable as priority number. How can asterisk know the second priority if all other priority have 'n' as priority number? In a relational database there is no 'sequential read'.In other words, you need to assign the priority to all entries.LeandroIl giorno 03/ago/2012 06:27, "virendra bhati" <virbh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Hi Team,
I want to used 'n' as priority in asterisk realtime but asterisk don't support n as next priority....
I am using Asterisk 1.4.41
--
Thanks and regards
Virendra Bhati
+91-9718300881
Asterisk Developer
E-mail-: virbh...@gmail.com
Skype id:- virbhati2
New Delhi(India)
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
