On 09/13/2012 03:20 AM, Olivier wrote:


2012/8/31 Jeff LaCoursiere <j...@sunfone.com <mailto:j...@sunfone.com>>

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
    <mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com>
    > [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
    <mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com>] On Behalf Of Jeff
    > LaCoursiere
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:24 PM
    > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
    <mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
    > Subject: [asterisk-users] FAX detection in chan_dahdi 1.8.15
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I recently replaced a site that was using 1.4.[mumble] with
    > hylafax/iaxmodem.  They have an RBS T1 and were using about half
    of their 50
    > DID numbers for "fax to email".  This all broke with the new
    system :(
    >
    > The original chan_dahdi.conf had no mention of "faxdetect", so I
    assume it
    > was operating with whatever is the default.  Off?
    >
    > The new box originally had "faxdetect=no", and I found that all
    my test
    > faxes failed with negotiation errors.  When I finally tried
    > "faxdetect=incoming" test faxes from another machine running
    hylafax went
    > through fine, and I thought I was done.
    >
    > The following week the customer reported that inbound faxes
    weren't working.
    > When I looked at the log, I saw lots of these:
    >
    > chan_dahdi.c:     -- Redirecting DAHDI/24-1 to fax extension
    >
    > Which in my FreePBX setup eventually goes to a "no service"
    message and
    > hangs up.  I've never defined a "fax" extension and don't really
    know what
    > that is about.  Turns out that any fax machine that calls ends
    up following
    > this path.  If my other hylafax server calls, it follows the
    normal path and
    > gets answered by my pool of iaxmodems. I don't really understand the
    > difference between the two types of calls, first of all.
    >
    > So it seems from this experience and a recent thread on -users
    that enabling
    > faxdetection in chan_dahdi sets up some additional buffering
    that at least
    > in my case, in 1.8, seems to be required (without it all inbound
    faxes fail
    > from my hylafax server with negotiation problems).
    > Unfortunately for me, this also seems to bypass normal DID
    handling and
    > sends calls to an undefined "fax extension".
    >
    > Can anyone shed some light?
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > j
    >
    > On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 15:28 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
    > IIRC correctly this is sort of like the "s" extension; you set
    up your
    fax
    > handler in [default,fax,1].  Not sure how that is done in FreePBX.
    >
    >

    I've managed to hack a fix for this... in chan_dahdi.c I found two
    places where an "async goto" happens right after the message
    "Redirecting to fax extension".  I simply commented it out in both
    places.

    While looking a the source I noticed that an attempt is made to
    create a
    new channel variable "FAXEXTEN" with a comment "save the DID number
    before sending to the fax extension".  I created a "fax" context in
    extensions.conf and tried to use ${FAXEXTEN} to properly route my
    inbound fax to email calls, but it turns out that it is just set
    to "s",
    which isn't useful at all.  I spent some time trying to figure out
    where
    in the channel structure the actual DID information exists, as
    properly
    setting the "FAXEXTEN" variable is arguably the right "fix" for my
    problem.  But I'm just not familiar enough with the internals :( I'm
    surprised others haven't had this issue...

    Anyway commenting out the redirection did the trick for me.

    Cheers,

    j


Which Freepbx version are you using ?
Have you installed Freepbx's "Fax Configuration" module ?

Are you trying to attach fax-to-email service to incoming DIDs or to SIP endpoints ?


FreePBX 2.10

Originally, just because I usually do an install and let FreePBX load all available modules, it did load that module. Original advice was to remove that module, which had no effect on my problem. It is removed now anyway.

The intention is individual DIDs go to specific fax email addresses. I saw your explanation for what you are trying to accomplish, and it sounds interesting. Curious to see if you get it working.

Cheers,

j
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to