On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Olivier <oza.4...@gmail.com> wrote: > [ 42.969568] dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r10414 I would suggest updating DAHDI. We moved from svn to git years ago and that repository is not maintained.
> 17: 2216 7235841 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, wct2xxp > Does it qualify as "incompatible with Dahdi because of shared IRQ" or can I > get along and keep testing on this machine ? This is fine. I would only worry about sharing irqs with hardware that would compete for interrupt time, like a network controller or disk controller. > At the same time, I'm seeing timing slips as with: > The rate is 3 slips/minute. > Has this figure any meaning (I don't have any other card to compare with) ? 3 slips a minute is too high. You'll likely hear audio artifacts like clicks or pops if you were listening to audio on the line. This may give you a bit more info on acceptable slip rates. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UNfzEuv1uk#t=1578 > my_handle_dchan_exception: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on D-channel of > Thoughts ? HDLC aborts are a symptom of timing slips, typically. If you're legitimately recovering timing from the network properly, then I would look at what the upstream provider is doing. Your provider should be able to run long term loop/pattern tests to your smartjack to determine link quality issues. -- Russ Meyerriecks Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA direct: +1 256-428-6025 Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users