On 7/02/2014 3:38 AM, Tech Support wrote:
All;

I’m running Asterisk 1.8.15-cert3 with the newest version of spandsp.
I’ve even tried unloading that and using Digium’s FFA module but I
receive the same error on an outbound transmission:

[2014-02-06 14:35:14] ERROR[19066]: udptl.c:294 encode_open_type: UDPTL
(SIP/XXXXXXXXXXX_outbound-00000000): Buffer overflow detected (59 + 127
 > 175)

I only get this with one specific upstream provider. Has anyone seen
this before? Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.


Not sure if this relates to T38FaxMaxDatagram, here is an extract from a sample sip.conf file.

; In some cases, T.38 endpoints will provide a T38FaxMaxDatagram value (during T.38 setup) that ; is based on an incorrect interpretation of the T.38 recommendation, and results in failures ; because Asterisk does not believe it can send T.38 packets of a reasonable size to that ; endpoint (Cisco media gateways are one example of this situation). In these cases, during a ; T.38 call you will see warning messages on the console/in the logs from the Asterisk UDPTL ; stack complaining about lack of buffer space to send T.38 FAX packets. If this occurs, you ; can set an override (globally, or on a per-device basis) to make Asterisk ignore the ; T38FaxMaxDatagram value specified by the other endpoint, and use a configured value instead. ; This can be done by appending 'maxdatagram=<value>' to the t38pt_udptl configuration option,
; like this:
;
; t38pt_udptl = yes,fec,maxdatagram=400 ; Enables T.38 with FEC error correction and overrides ; ; the other endpoint's provided value to assume we can ; ; send 400 byte T.38 FAX packets to it.
;

Larry.

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to