On 3/18/2014 6:58 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, James Sharp <ja...@fivecats.org> wrote:
Putting a whole bunch of people into a listen-only/muted Confbridge
conference or getting the broadcaster audio into a MOH class and then just
having callers attach to that MOH class?
Does the the muted side of a Confbridge Room still try to mix in audio from
the muted channels or does it just disregard those channels and only run
mixes against unmuted channels?
Now, if the answer is "MOH is more efficient", can someone suggest a way for
a channel to be the source of a MOH class?
What sort of channel count are you looking for? We did some load
testing recently and found less people in a bridge is better then
more. Audio source location didn't really matter much.
A few hundred to start with, but as with everything, I'd like to scale
up as far as I can. And, of course, it makes sense that "less people in
a bridge is better than more" but that's not quite what I'm asking.
Is it more efficient to have, for example, 701 people in a confbridge
room (700 muted users + 1 person yapping) or to have 700 people dialed
in and just running the MusicOnHold application with said person yapping
away via some audio source.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
