Hi,
I made some interesting observations regarding this.
Remind the following scenario:
asterisk registers number A towards provider A (sipgate.de)
asterisk also registers another number towards provider B (tel.t-online.de)

I make a test call from a remote location, which is registered as well towards provider B.

What happens on the asterisk?

have a look below.
It seems that the registration to number B of provider B, which sends the incoming call to asterisk, brings asterisk out of order, because the ACKs are sent to the wrong port. after some time the ACK of provider B reaches asterisk on the right port (55060), but that is maybe by accident. when the trunk to provider B is disabled it works fine immediately.
That explains, why calls to sipgate.de are cancelled after about 30s.
But can someone explain that? Is it an issue of provider B (which I can't believe, it is one of the biggest here in germany)?



217.10.79.9:5060 10.17.46.99:55060 217.0.23.36:5060 10.17.46.99:65319 10.17.46.99:505 ──────────┬───────── ──────────┬───────── ──────────┬───────── ──────────┬───────── ──────────┬────── ▒ │ INVITE (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:47.695820 │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.001354 │ 100 Trying │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:47.697174 │ <────────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.024128 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:47.721302 │ <────────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.418916 │ INVITE (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.140218 │ ────────────────────────>>> │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.000464 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.140682 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.047604 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.188286 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +0.033199 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.221485 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.413234 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.634719 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +0.073871 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:48.708590 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +1.513110 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:50.221700 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.478899 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:50.700599 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +3.520824 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:54.221423 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.524939 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:54.746362 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +3.475120 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:26:58.221482 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.482321 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:26:58.703803 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +3.519206 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:27:02.223009 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ ▒ +0.481228 │ │ │ ACK │ │ ▒ 18:27:02.704237 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +3.518524 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ ▒ 18:27:06.222761 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ │ +0.483722 │ │ │ ACK │ │ │ 18:27:06.706483 │ │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ │ +3.516816 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ │ │ │ 18:27:10.223299 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ │ │ │ +0.484398 │ │ ACK │ │ │ │ 18:27:10.707697 │ │ <────────────────────────── │ │ │ │ +59.790625 │ │ │ BYE │ │ 18:28:10.498322 │ │ │ ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────> │




Am 15.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Andre Gronwald:
ok, now it is getting weird...
actually i don't see any firewall issues, but i am not able to get a call from outside to my sipgate account. in asterisk nothing is visible, core set verbose is activated.
sngrep (on my asterisk server) shows me indeed the invite from sipgate!?

What I see via sngrep is the following options-flow:
192.168.3.50:55060 -> 217.10.79.9:5060
217.10.79.9:5060 -> 192.168.3.50:48757 (200 OK)

shouldn't sipgate answer on the same port that the communication initiated??? in this case 55060?


-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Join the Asterisk Community at the 13th AstriCon, September 27-29, 2016
      http://www.asterisk.org/community/astricon-user-conference

New to Asterisk? Start here:
      https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to