On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Dan Cropp wrote: > Thank you Joshua. > > We're trying to run more tests. > We believe Cisco may not be adhering to the specification. > Unfortunately, we're also stuck with having to make it work. > > An interesting test, I commented out the norefersub from the > res_pjsip_refer.c code just for a test. Without this, Cisco does sent > the NOTIFY packets to let Asterisk know the status (Trying, Ringing, > OK, 486 Busy Here, ...) > > Would it make sense for me to try including the Refer-Sub in the REFER > packet Asterisk sends to Cisco? Perhaps Cisco sees the norefersub, but > not the Refer-Sub header. It may interpret the lack of a Refer-Sub > header in the REFER incorrectly?
It's entirely possible it might. It doesn't hurt to try. -- Joshua C. Colp Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
