-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 24 March 2004 08:45 pm, James H. Thompson wrote: > No guarantee then when public IPs match that clients are both on same NAT > LAN. > > Client A 192.168.0.1 ----- NAT Router A --------- NAT Router X with > Public IP 123.123.123.123 --- Internet > Client B 192.168.0.1 ----- NAT Router B ---------|
The thing is that it's all controlled by your gateway configuration. This is where you define where you find what. You must know the IP (or domain name and use DNS) of where the recipient is. If you are calling a local host you must know the IP. If you call an external host you must also must know his internet address. He'd have a redirect in his firewall that would route to his internal machine. You have no need/use of knowing what his internal IP address is. I've done all the above in many combinations. I have one setup on CA and one in FL. I have had CA call over IP to FL, then fwd the call to a local external land line and call right back in again on another land line. I have called and transferred calls to a local LAN phone as well as over the Internet. > Jim > > James H. Thompson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:26 PM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 as an IETF Standard? > > > Robert Hajime Lanning wrote: > > ><quote who="Adam Hart"> > > > > > >>I also like to see two > > >>people behind the same nat being able to communicate directly > > >> (without requiring pin-wheeling). Ie The client attaches their > > >> private ip to the register packet, which is used when client A & B's > > >> public ips match. > > > > > >192.168.1.0/24 -- NAT-BOX -- Internet -- NAT-BOX -- 192.168.1.0/24 > > > > > > IAX phone Asterisk-Box IAX phone > > > > > >umm... I would suggest the default setting to be off, as the above > > > topology would be very common. > > > > from my post: "which is used when client A & B's public ips match." > > meaning in this situation both clients would have different public IPs > > and it wouldn't be used. > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users - -- Steve "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYlQhljK16xgETzkRAswxAKDCgmT26JjACY6hAN/lwOm11vpbNwCdH66u VbFTyZQijeBQ0EoEW6xWJUg= =FeX8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users