--Original Message Text--- From: Barry Fawthrop Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:07:24 -0500
----- Original Message ----- From: Christian Stredicke To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 10:05 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX and Snom200 >We thought about this option. I guess the IAX2 is not the problem. We >believe the real problem will be the user interface. >snom would have no problem providing the platform (hardware plus >operating system and stuff like audio), but we simply don’t want to >open another development branch (already got enough trouble with >SIP.-). >I personally think its ok to optimize the SIP interoperability. All >that you can do in IAX can also be done in SIP (or am I making a big >mistake here?). > >Christian > >There is the big difference. in that IAX handles NAT much better, esp. >double NAT (security) >Im not sure if you work for snom, but I'm willing to help out where I >can. >Anyone else care to list the differences between SIP and IAX2? I>f would be great to get a comprehensive list, Mark or the digium guys >??? >Barry I agree that NAT traversal is a huge issue in the SOHO/Small office environment. If the Verbiage (sp?) IAX capable phone is a good product then it will become my preference over the Snom 200. I have several Snom 200s and I like them very much. However, the simplicity of IAX2 installation is too good to pass up. Michael -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "...All we are is dust in the wind." - Kansas ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users