G'day list, It appears I got ahead of myself in believing I'd solved my CND (caller id) problem. My callerid.c change got it working on one of the handsets I have, but not the other. (Recap: The AU CND standard has an increased delay between the end of the ring signal and the start of the CND FSK data -- it's 500ms in US GR-30-CORE, and around 700ms in AU DC.002/TS030).
I've manipulated this delay value in an attempt to come up with something that it likes, to no avail. This handset is a DORO 5045[1], and CND works fine when it's plugged into a telco line with CND enabled. It also works fine when attached to an ATA-186 with the default Caller*ID settings for the US -- and this confuses me most of all. Surely * and the ATA are generating the same CID data? My latest theory is that the FSK waveform * generates is not being transmitted at the regulation -13.5dBm, but attenuating the waveform does not help[2]. Also, to rub salt into the wound, CW/CID works on this handset! I'm almost at my wit's end with this. If there is someone out there with a copy of the TS030 standard document that they could summarise, I'd appreciate it (there's a summary of GR-30 at http://www.testmark.com/develop/tml_callerid_cnt.html that I've been using to understand the process; something that compares TS030 to this would be fantastic). Otherwise, if anyone has any hints on getting CID to work with various handset types, I'd really appreciate that as well. Regards, Vic Cross [1] In a vicious stroke of irony, the handset that now works okay (after I modified the CID start delay) is an Audioline FF895, manufactured by -- wait for it -- DORO! [2] It would also help eliminate one possible red herring if someone could say for sure if the transmit level is being set correctly for the FSK waveform. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
