we have the same problem could you please send me the chan_sip2 info. Thanks!
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 14:23, Geert Nijpels wrote: > Ian White wrote: > > > > > On Apr 22, 2004, at 23:48, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > > >> Geert Nijpels wrote: > >> > >>> Ian White wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On recent releases of the snom200 firmware, the MWI indicator will > >>>> turn on, but won't turn off when the message has been checked. It > >>>> works on firmware 2.03o, but not in 2.04g or newer. I filed a bug > >>>> report with snom, but they're claiming it is an asterisk issue and > >>>> that it should have been resolved. They suggested that I ask on the > >>>> list. > >>>> > >>>> "Anyway, Asterisk had a bug where it didn't send the NOTIFY > >>>> correctly to > >>>> turn off the MWI. The message doesn't contain the line so the phone > >>>> doesn't know which line to apply the messages to. > >>>> > >>>> Basically the NOTIFY message should contain something like the > >>>> following: > >>>> NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];line=34n34jed SIP/2.0 > >>>> > >>>> There was a bugfix for this in Asterisk for this problem, do you have > >>>> that applied?" > >>>> > >>>> I am running the current CVS version, and don't see anything in the > >>>> code that looks like this has been touched, and I haven't seen > >>>> reference to it on this list. They are right in that the line > >>>> information isn't being sent, looking at the SIP debugs on both > >>>> ends. Anybody have ideas? > >>>> > >>>> Ian > >>>> > >>> This is a problem I have been digging into a bit. In my case > >>> asterisk did not send out the NOTIFY with the header Content-Type: > >>> "application/simple-message-summary", but with "Content-Type: > >>> text/plain", so the NOTIFY is treated as a txt message. In result, > >>> when I pressed the MWI button, I saw the text from asterisk stating > >>> the amount of messages I have. I changed it to work, and now > >>> asterisk calls the extension the message is sent from > >>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). After calling this the MWI indication > >>> disappears, I'm not sure if it also disappears after calling from > >>> another phone. > >>> I'm using chan_sip2 and I changed some stuff, so I'm not sure if > >>> this is also a problem with standard chan_sip (the txt vs vm issue). > >> > >> > >> Chan_sip2 handles Contact: differently than chan_sip and works better > >> with Snom phones. > >> It's actually where the whole chan_sip2 project started... :-) > > > > > > Any idea what sort of time frame before chan_sip2 becomes usable in a > > production environment, or at least becomes part of the CVS tree? I > > see your note saying that you are using it in production. > > I'm using it with some changes with -stable. It's developed by oej for > -devel. Works great with my SNOM's and Cisco 9760. > > You can get chan_sip2 through the bugtracker: > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000759 > > I can also send you my -stable version, but you can backport it with > some minor trouble yourself. > > Geert > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users