Try upgrading your kernel... This is the original shipped kernel and is very
buggy. I would suggest getting "yum" It can be retrieved from:

http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/redhat/9/yum/yum-2.0.4-1.rh.fr.i386.rpm

Once installed you can just type "yum update kernel" as root at a bash
shell. Or if you would like to update your whole system type: "yum update"
This should fix that problem..

Scott
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlos Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on a dual processor machine


>
> Hi there, i have a problem installing asterisk on a dual processor
machine.I have Red Hat 9.0 with kernel-smp-2.4.20-6. I did the installation
process with no problem, i used the asterisk stable version 1.0.
>
> The problem is that the machine has some troubles after Asterisk goes up,
the CPU performance goes to 99%, and its all consumed by the asterisk
process. I dont know if there is a special process to compile asterisk using
dual-processor or maybe a special version or what steps do i have to follow
to make asterisk works fine on that machine.
>
> The only message error that i have, is when i tried to load the card
module...when i put "modprobe wct4xxp" it shows me the following message:
>
> "NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue. You probably
have a hardware problem with your RAM chips".
>
> After that i follow the rest of loading steps and asterisk goes up just
fine. But how i mentioned above after a few minutes the CPU performance goes
to 99% and the machine is impossible to handle.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Carlos Andres Medina
>
> CVCOL S.A
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to