On Friday 18 June 2004 11:08, Lee Howard wrote: > If you would rather use HylaFAX instead of spandsp and have $10K to > throw around, then may I suggest hiring an Asterisk channel author to > write a T.38-supporting channel driver? That way you could just use > t38modem with HylaFAX, and you wouldn't need all the duplicate hardware.
I am gearing up to write a character port emulator which will telnet to an Ascend Max modem bank for HylaFax. It's based on code from ttywatch which does the opposite. (it is a telnet daemon that connects to a character port) -- rtty, ser2net and conserver are all apps which do the opposite.
Hopefully it will work alright, as the Ascend Max will give you a direct connection to its modem bank when enabled.
I was going to use T38modem but, like practically everything else h.323, the code is disgustingly hard to wade through. :-(
Well, if you don't like t38modem, then a really cool thing would be if you wrote a T.38 driver for HylaFAX also. So then Asterisk and HylaFAX could play together without t38modem, without the AT command-response language limitations.
Lee. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
