> I'm taking a slight tangent here, but stay with me..... > It looks like there are three methods of using HFC-S based ISDN BRI cards > with *. Capi (via capi.conf), zaphfc (via zapata.conf), and isdn4linux (via > modem.conf). Why, and which one is better and for which reasons? >
zaphfc is the best solution, because you get a zaptel timing source, NT mode support and echo cancelation! capi would be the next option, but then you would need to use mISDN which is not as stable. isdn4linux shouldnt be used at all. It is good for data application but unusable for voice (you will enjoy lots of echo and an increasing latency). -- best regards Klaus -- Klaus-Peter Junghanns CEO, CTO Junghanns.NET GmbH Breite Straße 13 - 12167 Berlin - Germany fon: (de) +49 30 79705390 fon: (uk) +44 870 1244692 fax: (de) +49 30 79705391 iaxtel: 1-700-157-8753 http://www.Junghanns.NET/asterisk/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users