Hi all. We've been working on this with PRI's from USLEC connecting to a Cisco AS5300 as the gateway. We are sending the CNAM information, but they can't read it dynamically. We are stuck (for now) with manually sending in database update requests.
Having said all that, we're looking at pulling in some SS7 trunks, and that changes the game. -ejay > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Alfred R. Nurnberger > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can one send CLID NAME over PRI? > > I ran a PRI DEBUG SPAN 1 on our office system. > I could not see any FACILITIES messages on outgoing calls > over the PRI. > So I suppose * does not send the CNAME messages at all on > outgoing calls. > > CLID NAME is just a subset of the generic user to user > messaging on ISDN > networks. > > It should be possible to send characterset IE5 u2u messages > and have them > show up on other ISDN compatible phones. btw. The GSM standard for > cellphones is based on ISDN. > > Any comments on that ? > > - Alfred > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Todd > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 8:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can one send CLID NAME over PRI? > > > At 2:17 PM -0700 on 6/25/04, Ehud Gavron wrote: > >Is it possible to send CLID NAME on a PRI? > > > >The numbers we send out are being received by telco and propagated, > >but the names we send out are not showing up. > >Is this a feature in PRI? Do we need to set PRI_NET instead > of PRI_CPE? > >Is this just not possible? Is this a telco config issue? > > > >Thanks for your help... I've read voip-info, and various > other sources, and > >search engines, and google... with no success. > > > >Ehud > >[snip] > > No, CNAM (Caller NAMe) data is looked up via caller ID digit > information by the far end (or somewhere in the middle.) This is a > vestige of telephone companies wanting to control the entire process > from the center, versus the "next-generation" systems like VoIP > wanting to control it from the edges. Welcome to the first ring of > hell; it gets warmer the closer you get to SS7. > > You cannot (yet) transmit this information to any providers in North > America, so far as I am aware. You would have to pay your upstream > PSTN (SS7) carrier to insert these records in some central database, > probably Verisign or the ILEC from which the number is purchased. If > you don't "own" the numbers that you're transiting, then you're out > of luck. > > An interesting trick between Asterisk servers might be to use the UUI > (User-to-User Information) data that is part of the PRI q.931 > specifications. It is unknown at this time how many carriers > actually pass UUI data from end-to-end, and there currently exist > only a few sparse patches for Asterisk that deal it. > > For some additional discussion, use Google or start here: > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-Septembe r/ > 001748.html > > > JT > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
