I am using ISDN 64k + VOIP (iLBC, G729, GSM codecs only!) + bulk traffic (FTP, P2P, E-Mail, etc.).
I am using tc, HTB 3.6 + finer tuned wshaper script. It works pretty well for me. The callee never misses any VOIP packet from my side. So I guess HTB + QOS works pretty well, even for VOIP. I use a VOIP only queue and all queues with fixed rates + correct ceil values. I never have tested CBQ yet so I can't tell you, if CBQ outperformes HTB on VOIP queuing. Blackvel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Rich Murphey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 1:56 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Priorizing of packets > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Shaw > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dr. Rich Murphey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 1:28 PM > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Priorizing of packets > > > > > > > Can HTB minimize latency better than CBQ? > > > > > > Just curious, > > > Rich > > > > Hmm I've had problems using HTB, it seems to make voice > > quality a lot worse than with a well tuned CBQ.... Maybe I'm > > just using it wrong? > > > > -Chris > > Yea, lag is the only issue I've observed with CBQ, and most papers point to > solutions that involve management (lowering) of MTU of the non-voip packets. > There doesn't seem to be any open source for that yet. > > Cheers, > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
