On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 05:47:59 -0400 Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > From what I have heard, Asterisk does not allow for > iLBC to > > take advantage of the lost packet concealment. > > I understand this has something to do with the jitter > > processing. > > Can you provide a source for that statement? I am not > disputing it but I'd > like to have it in the archives for one, but also to > verify the claim too. > > Regards, > Andrew Hi
Here I am quoting Steve Davies: "For IAX2, at least, Asterisk does not use the lost-packet-concealment of any codec. This is because the incoming frames "clock" Asterisk. For iLBC's lost packet concealment to work, Asterisk would have to start calling the decoder with a NULL at the point when the missing packet should have arrived. Can't say for sure for SIP, but I'd guess that its the same. Steve" Regards Clive > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ______________________________________________________________ Herbalife Independent Distributor http://www.healthiest.co.za _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users